I’d like to use some
Rockwool in my studio to improve the acoustics, but this is the first
time I’ll have used it, so I could do with some pointers about how to
work with it. What is the best density for a good, fairly wide-spectrum
absorber? I have found some quite cheap Rockwool that is 100kg/m3. Is
that any good?
Via SOS web site
SOS Reviews Editor Matt Houghton replies:
The denser
the material, the more effective it will be at absorbing low
frequencies, but the flip side of this is that it also becomes better at
reflecting higher frequencies back into the room. The 100kg/m3 product
that you’ve mentioned should do a decent job, but it’s denser than I’d
choose for a broadband absorber. In fact, in my home studio, I use
100mm-thick 100kg/m3 Rocksilk for bass trapping, with a decent gap
behind it.
However, if you then place some acoustic foam over the top of
it you’ll have a much more effective acoustic absorber, as the dense
Rockwool will absorb lower frequencies, while the foam will absorb some
of the highs that would otherwise be reflected, making a very effective
broadband absorber. If you don’t want the foam, try looking for mineral
wool in the region of 45-75kg/m3. Remember to cover these slabs in some
acoustically transparent material that will trap any stray fibres. If
you’re in a commercial studio, this will need to meet fire safety
regulations, but for a home studio you could get away with a cotton
sheet (I’ve used tablecloths!).
No comments:
Post a Comment