I’ve been trying to
use a pair of AKG C414s in a coincident X-Y mode, but am finding it
physically difficult to mount the microphones. I’ve seen references to
vertically aligned and horizontally aligned methods, but these terms
imply different mounting arrangements to me. I’ve also heard reference
to a Blumlein technique, but I thought that utilises figure-of-eight
polar patterns, whereas I was planning on using cardioid in order to
maintain focus. Can you clarify the correct technique for using X-Y with
the 414s, please?
Via SOS web site
SOS
Technical Editor Hugh Robjohns replies:
Blumlein is a specific
sub-form of a coincident (often referred to as an X-Y) stereo
microphone arrangement. Basically, X-Y is normally used to imply a
stereo array with coincident capsules, whereas A-B normally means spaced
microphones, although not everyone uses these terms in the same way.
The physical angle between the two microphones in an X-Y array (the
mutual angle) and their polar patterns is not defined in the umbrella
X-Y term. More or less any mutual angle can be used, and any directional
polar pattern, and it would still be an X-Y array. Blumlein is a very
specific form of X-Y array. It uses coincident capsules with
figure-of-eight polar patterns, and a 90-degree mutual angle (although
this is sometimes eased out to 80 degrees to alter the stereo imaging).
As
for the correct X-Y mounting technique, there is only one arrangement
for end-fire small-diaphragm microphones, shown below in the first
example.
However, as you have discovered, mounting side-address large-diaphragm
microphones can often be a little more taxing and requires more
versatile mounting hardware. Basically, the two microphone capsules have
to be mounted such that they are coincident in the horizontal plane,
and that means they have to be placed with one directly above the other.
In this way, sound wave fronts from any source arrive at both capsules
at the same time. Stereo imaging information is captured by the level
differences imposed by the polar patterns and the fact that the mics are
pointing in different directions; there are no timing differences
between the left and right channels. So, ideally, the microphones should
be mounted vertically with one above the other, as in the second
example,
Mounting the mics vertically one above the other generally requires
either two stands or the creative use of some guitar clamps, although
Microtech Gefell and AEA (among others) make suitable brackets for
supporting mics vertically. Mounting the mics horizontally above one
another can be achieved a little more easily with a wide stereo bar
and some pillars or stacked thread adaptors to hold the mics clear of
the bar.
An arrangement that’s often used and is
far more convenient, albeit with slightly less imaging accuracy,
because the capsules are spaced slightly in the horizontal plane (and
will therefore capture some small time-of-arrival differences, as well
as the wanted level differences due to the polar pattern), can be seen
in the fourth example.
This format can be achieved with a short
stereo bar very easily and, in practice, works very well. With a wider
stereo bar to allow greater spacing between the mics, you can easily
turn this into an ORTF stereo array (capsule spacing of 17cm with a
110-degree mutual angle on cardioid patterns).
The one arrangement you should never use can be seen in the fifth example.
The problem with this configuration is that each microphone sits
directly in the active area of the polar pattern of the other mic,
forming an acoustic shadow for high-frequency sounds, which will mess up
the imaging fairly comprehensively.
No comments:
Post a Comment