I’m curious to know how common the use of re-amping
is amongst producers, engineers and composers. There are so many
applications for this that I find it strange that re-amp circuits are
not built into mixers, DI boxes, soundcards and audio interfaces.
There
are also relatively few re-amp boxes available, and they’re all
absurdly overpriced! What is so complex about a re-amp box to warrant a
price tag of over £200?
Via SOS web site
SOS
Technical Editor Hugh Robjohns replies:
Re-amping is the process
whereby the direct signal from a guitar, bass or keyboard is recorded —
usually on a separate track alongside the signal captured
simultaneously with a microphone from an amp — and later routed to an
amp in a studio to be miked up and overdubbed.
This
approach allows the choice of amp or amp settings, or mic and mic
position, to be changed after the initial recorded performance, but
without the compromises and limitations inherent in trying to process an
already recorded amp sound. It is a popular and widely used technique,
although it is more common in the production of some musical genres
than others. Re-amping can be both a time saver and a time waster,
depending on how and why it is employed! As a way of modifying a
guitar part to better suit the track as the mix progresses, it is an
invaluable technique, saving the time and effort of having to record a
new performance. However, if used to avoid committing to a sound during
tracking, it can be an enormous time waster.
Often,
traditional re-amping is replaced by virtual re-amping using guitar-amp
plug-ins, many of which offer remarkably good quality and enormous
versatility. The process is exactly the same, but without having to
physically route the signal out of the DAW and into a real amp in a
real studio, miked up with real mics.
There are
various products available with integrated facilities for re-amping, as
well as dedicated re-amping units, although the latter approach seems
the more popular. There is nothing complicated about a re-amp box,
which, in most cases, is essentially a passive DI box used in reverse.
A
re-amping box accepts a balanced line-level signal (nominally +4dBu)
and converts it to an unbalanced instrument-level signal (nominally
-18dBu), usually via a transformer. A variable level control is often
provided to optimise the level fed to the amp, along with a
ground-lift facility to separate the balanced source and unbalanced
output grounds, thus avoiding ground-loop hum problems.
A passive DI box can often be used reasonably well in
this role, although it is normally necessary to attenuate the
line-level input significantly, to avoid saturating the transformer and
generating an excessive unbalanced output level. Alternatively, the kind
of line-level balanced/unbalanced interface intended for connecting
domestic equipment to professional systems can be used, and the original
ART CleanBox is often recommended in this role. However, for only a
slightly greater outlay, a dedicated re-amp box, such as the Radial
ProRMP, is rather more convenient to use.
No comments:
Post a Comment