I’d like to know what
the advantages and disadvantages are of using stand-alone word clock
units, like Apogee, Lynx, Antelope, Mytek and so on, versus the old
built-in word clock in a TC Konnekt Studio 48. I don’t need many sockets
(up to six, maybe) and I’m OK with daisy-chaining my gear as I do now,
but would a separate word clock have many advantages over what I have
now? I can put around £400 to £500 aside to buy something, if it’s
worth it. Via SOS web site
SOS Technical Editor
Hugh Robjohns replies:
If it ain’t broke, why fix it? As a general
point, running separately buffered clock feeds from a clock distribution
unit is technically better (in terms of jitter and overall timing
precision) than the daisy-chain technique. However, there’s nothing
fundamentally wrong with daisy-chaining either. And if it’s working
reliably now, there’s no obvious need to change anything.
In
general, converters (A-D and D-A) work better and deliver better
technical performance if they run from their own internal clocks. Almost
without exception, the measurable performance of most converters driven
from external clocks is degraded, and the best you can hope for is that
the degradation is negligible or minimal. Devices that process and pass
only digital signals are not particularly critical of the clocking
arrangements and quality is totally unaffected by moderate clock jitter.
So my usual recommendation is to use the
internal clock of your ‘master’ A-D converter as the system’s master
clock, and distribute that via a dedicated clock distribution unit. The
Drawmer D-Clock provides good value for money, for example.
If you’re working with external video machines,
then a master clock usually becomes a necessity because of the need to
synchronise video and word clock, and in that situation I think the best
value for money comes from something like the Mutec Iclock or Audio
Design SynchroGenius. For the very few audio-only installations where
a master clock is beneficial for practical reasons then, again, the
Drawmer M-Clock boxes provide excellent value for money.
As I demonstrated in the article ‘Does Your Studio Need A Digital Master Clock?’ [go to www.soundonsound.com/sos/jun10/articles/masterclocks.htm
for the full article], the more expensive options like the Big Ben and
the Antelope offered no detectable advantages in terms of audio quality,
and few, if any, facilities that aren’t available elsewhere for less.
If
I were you, I’d invest that money in something else that would make
a real, practical and tangible difference to your music-making
activities.
No comments:
Post a Comment