I have the usual
selection of Stagg and anonymous mic stands, which are fine most of the
time, but I now have some mics that are really pretty heavy (SE
Electronics’ Gemini III, for instance) and none of my present stands
really cut it. Of course, all mic stands are described as ‘heavy duty’,
but I’m looking for something that can hold really heavy microphones
reliably and with the minimum of hard twisting of small knobs and so
on.Of course, SE make a suitable stand, but I’m not sure I could justify
$500 on one mic stand. Can you suggest anything usable below, say, $150?
Via SOS web site
SOS
Technical Editor Hugh Robjohns replies:
If you can use a mic stand
without a boom arm — so, just the vertical pole — there shouldn’t be any
problem, because even budget mic stands should be able to support the
heaviest microphone without too much trouble. The real problem comes
when trying to hang a heavy mic on a boom arm, because most ordinary mic
stands don’t have anything like a sufficient counterweight mass to
properly balance even moderate mics, let alone big, heavy ones. As
a result, the boom arm clutch has to resist almost all of the rotational
force created by the leverage of the heavy mic at the end of the boom
and, frankly, most just aren’t up to the job. The inevitable consequence
is the annoying ‘droopage’, and the more you try to tighten the clutch
to prevent it, the quicker the whole thing wears out (or breaks), and
quickly becomes droopy even when supporting light microphones!
The
correct engineering solution is to properly counterbalance the weight
of the microphone so that there is no net rotational force at the boom
clutch. That then allows the clutch to do what it was intended to do —
stop the boom arm from moving — rather than have to accommodate the
entire rotational leverage. The cheap and cheerful solution is to tape
or affix some additional weight to the end of the boom arm; you need
enough to balance your heaviest mic at the maximum boom extension you
plan to use. However, this will be ugly and may not be as safe as it
should be, and you certainly don’t want the weight to fall off onto
someone’s foot... or the mic to crash onto the floor shortly afterwards!
I know the idea of spending $500 on a mic stand seems silly, but, to be honest, I think it’s worth it for peace of mind when you’re working with mics that cost $1500
and potential personal injury insurance claims! Moreover, mic stands in
this cost bracket generally live forever, because they are so well
designed and rugged, which means that the amortised investment is
actually very low.
The SE mic stand is
surprisingly stable, but it is a kind of hybrid of a reverse-engineered
Keith Monks boom arm and clutch from the 1970s and a drummer’s cymbal
stand. It does have a heavier counter-weight than most budget stands,
but it’s still not an ideal solution, to my mind.
The
most cost-effective and properly engineered stand I’ve come across to
date is the Sontronix Matrix 10.
It’s not the prettiest or most compact
stand on the planet — it’s basically a modified photography lighting
stand — but it has cogged clutches that definitely won’t slip, a very
sensible counterweight, removable wheels, and a handy drop-arm. It’s
very secure, totally reliable, and there’s nothing to break, so it will
live forever. I reviewed it in the August 2010 edition of Sound On Sound
(see the full review at
If
you want something in matt black and with a much smaller footprint,
I’ve just been reviewing the Latch Lake MicKing stands, which I have to
say are utterly brilliant. However, they are also pretty expensive,
because they are very well engineered, and imported from the US. The
review is soon to appear in Sound On Sound, but these stands have
a sensibly massive counterweight on the boom arm, a very heavy, but
compact, base (with transport wheels to make it easy to move the stand
to a storage area), a nice drop-arm system, and really ingenious lever
locks and clutches that are adjustable for both tension and ease of use.
These are very solid and impressive stands and well worth the
investment, in my view.
No comments:
Post a Comment