Via SOS web site
SOS Technical Editor Hugh Robjohns replies: Plosives are often a complete nightmare to remove, and the only real solution is to prevent them from happening in the first place.
Plosives — usually heard on words with Ps and Bs at
their start — send out a strong blast of air, which generally travels
forward and downward from the mouth. If that air blast reaches the
microphone diaphragm, it creates a massive pressure change that takes
a while to subside. If it hits a pressure-gradient mic (cardioid or
hypercardioid, for example) in which the diaphragm is inherently quite
floppy, the diaphragm can 'bottom out' and hit the backplate insulator.
This is mechanical clipping, and not only does the wanted waveform
become distorted, it can also take a surprisingly long time for the
diaphragm to recover properly. Also, some amplitude modulation occurs
where the wanted higher frequencies are modulated by the very
low-frequency diaphragm-waggling, and that process can quite easily last
for half a second or so. Quite a lot of the following word can be
affected, and that's what makes it so difficult to process plosive
blasts effectively.
As always, prevention is infinitely better than cure,
and stopping plosives from reaching the mic is really all about
positioning. Ideally, the mic should be positioned well above and/or
slightly to one side of the mouth. I find that raising the mic to around
forehead height works well, as this keeps it away from the track of
direct plosive blasts from the mouth, and also encourages the vocalist
to stand up straight, which aids their breathing. If the recording
environment is adequate, using an omnidirectional mic helps, because it
is less sensitive to the pressure changes caused by plosives.
If you really want the extremely intimate sound that
comes when the vocalist is trying to eat the mic, you must use a decent
pop shield and — this is the important bit — make sure there is at least
one inch of space between the mic's diaphragm and the pop shield (and
ideally two inches or more). Again, using an omnidirectional mic reduces
the susceptibility to plosive blasts, as well as negating
proximity-effect variations as the singer moves back and forth.
Perforated metal screens seem to be better than single
or dual-layer fabric pop shields, and purpose-designed, open-cell foam
pop shields are better still. I particularly like the universal Håkan
P110 (available from Sound-Link Pro-Audio), but the Rycote pop shield
that forms part of the Studio inVision kit is also superb and very easy
to use.
Another way to prevent plosive blasts is for the
vocalist to learn decent mic technique, turning away or side-stepping
slightly so that plosive blasts aren't directed straight at the
microphone.
If you have to salvage a recording that suffers from
plosive blasts, the first option, if possible, is to replace the
offending syllable with another 'pop-less' one from elsewhere in the
track. Failing that, the best plosive-processing tool I know of is
a software plug-in from CEDAR called DeThump (available for SADiE,
Pyramix, ProTools and CEDAR's own Cambridge system). It's not cheap, but
it's the only thing I know of that can remove plosive thumps cleanly
and without artifacts or compromised sound quality. If you can't afford
the plug-in (CEDAR do tend to be beyond the budget of a bedroom studio),
CEDAR offers a bureau service where you can send them the defective
track and they'll clean it up for a modest fee.
If that's not a viable option, try a combination of
fader automation and an automated high-pass filter to control the LF
thump (although this rarely works without some audible compromise).
Another option — which I generally prefer — is to use a spectral editor
(like Adobe Audition or Izotope RX2) to reduce or remove the LF content
during the plosive.
The bottom line, though, is that using and optimising any of these kinds of processing tools and techniques takes considerable time and skill. Life is so much easier if you pay attention during the recording and deal with plosive problems there and then; move the mic, fit a pop shield, or record a better take. If you ignore such flaws in the hope that you can fix them later, you'll spend far more time processing, get much more frustrated, and end up with inferior results anyway!
No comments:
Post a Comment