By Various
Someone suggested that I could
use a USB pen drive to record audio on my laptop. Is this a good
idea? How fast are they, and is it really a cheap way to separate my
system and audio drives, or are there any problems inherent in this approach?
Mark Hinter
SOS contributor Martin Walker
replies: USB pen drives (aka Flash drives and USB sticks) are an extremely
convenient way to carry your personal data around, and to transfer data from
one PC to another. They have increased in capacity over the last few years,
from handy 64MB notepads to seriously capacious drives typically offering
between 1GB and 8GB, at prices below $10.
With most modern operating systems, such as Mac OS X and
Windows 2000, XP and Vista, they are also 'plug and play', requiring no drivers
to be installed, so you can be confident that wherever you go you'll be able to
plug in your USB pen drive, wait for it to be automatically detected, and then
access your data.
However, recording audio is
a rather more serious undertaking, and relies on the one parameter
invariably omitted from USB pen drive specifications: sustained transfer rate,
or — in layman's terms — speed. Although many are described as 'fast', this is
invariably in comparison to older USB 1.1 compatible USB sticks that might take
a couple of yawn‑worthy minutes to save a 30MB file.
But let's turn for a moment to
the main reason for considering a USB pen drive: to separate your audio
files from the single hard drive found on most laptops. Given that you can buy
a 250GB internal hard drive for $30, it's scrimping on a Scrooge‑like
scale not to install a dedicated audio drive on a desktop audio PC.
However, laptops are intended to be portable devices, and carting around an
external drive somewhat defeats the object, which is why I suspect folk
are interested in trying a USB pen drive instead.
Many musicians expect audio nightmares
when recording and/or playing back multiple audio files from a hard drive
that already has Windows and all its applications installed on it. However, you
shouldn't worry unduly about your operating system being on the same drive,
since (as I showed back in PC Musician May 2005) Windows activity on
a properly-tweaked audio PC tends to be minimal once you've loaded your
sequencer application.
Ultimately, the question you should
ask yourself is whether your internal laptop drive is fast enough to record and
play back the maximum number of audio tracks you need. I carried out some
tests on a variety of hard drives in PC Notes April 2004, including
various laptop drives with speeds ranging from 4200rpm to 7200rpm and, despite
slowish sustained transfer rates of between 23MB and 36MB/second, all of them
were nevertheless perfectly capable of managing dozens of simultaneous
audio tracks.
USB
Flash Drives may be fast enough to play back a couple of dozen audio
tracks, but are considerably slower than most laptop hard drives, unless you
buy an expensive dual‑channel model that costs up to 10 times as
much.Let's turn our attention back to USB pen drive speed. It's tempting to
assume that pen drives will have a similarly huge bandwidth to system RAM,
but this isn't the case. I dug out several in my collection, and even the
fastest 1GB Emtec 1GB USB 2.0 Flash drive bought just a couple of weeks
ago (for about $7) only registered a modest 14MB/second, quite fast enough
to manage up to perhaps 20 24‑bit/96kHz audio tracks, but still about half the
speed of a typical 4200rpm laptop drive. The fastest pen drive I discovered
on the Internet (an OCZ Rally2 Turbo Dual Channel Flashdrive model costing
about $30) managed about 30MB/second, making it slightly slower than
a typical 5400rpm laptop hard drive.
So, yes, you could plug in
a USB pen drive and use it for audio recording, but simultaneous track
counts are likely to be considerably lower than those of even the slowest of
today's laptop hard drives, and if you're interested in performance, creating
a partition devoted to audio files on the laptop's single internal hard
drive will generally offer much better performance.
Published
March 2009
Published March 2009
No comments:
Post a Comment